On 05/22/2009 01:48 PM, Brian Pepple wrote:
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 09:24 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
I think search is, nowadays, critical functionality, not only because
it is widely used, but because it is built into those other two big
operating systems Linux is competing with.
I think putting out a release in which search is non-functional for
the two most important types of data (email and Web pages), when
search was functional for those two types of data in the previous
release, would be extremely unwise and a big black eye for Fedora.
While I understand the need to have relatively sane criteria for what
constitutes a release blocker, it is also, as the ReleaseCriteria page
points out, essentially a subjective judgment, and in this case I
think that looking at the forest, rather than the trees, would lead to
the conclusion that F11 shouldn't ship with these two bugs unfixed.
If we installed Beagle by default I would probably agree with you, but
since we don't I don't think these bugs should be considered a blocker
for release. But hey that's just my opinion, maybe the QA leads think
differently.
Agreed
Since this is not part of the "default install" it should not be considered
a blocker bug.
JBG
begin:vcard
fn:Johann B. Gudmundsson
n:Gudmundsson;Johann B.
org:Reiknistofnun - University of Iceland;IT Management
adr:Taeknigardi;;Dunhagi 5;Reykjavik;;107;Iceland
email;internet:johannbg@xxxxx
title:Unix System Engineer RHCE,CCSA
tel;work:+3545254267
tel;fax:+3545528801
tel;pager:N/A
tel;home:N/A
tel;cell:N/A
url:www.rhi.hi.is
version:2.1
end:vcard
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
