On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 09:24 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote: > I think search is, nowadays, critical functionality, not only because > it is widely used, but because it is built into those other two big > operating systems Linux is competing with. > > I think putting out a release in which search is non-functional for > the two most important types of data (email and Web pages), when > search was functional for those two types of data in the previous > release, would be extremely unwise and a big black eye for Fedora. > > While I understand the need to have relatively sane criteria for what > constitutes a release blocker, it is also, as the ReleaseCriteria page > points out, essentially a subjective judgment, and in this case I > think that looking at the forest, rather than the trees, would lead to > the conclusion that F11 shouldn't ship with these two bugs unfixed. If we installed Beagle by default I would probably agree with you, but since we don't I don't think these bugs should be considered a blocker for release. But hey that's just my opinion, maybe the QA leads think differently. Later, /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bpepple gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
