Re: does a fully updated beta correspond to an updated preview?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 6 May 2009, David wrote:

> You did read the warning about using Rawhide on production/needed
> machines did you not?  :-)
>
> Seriously. Rawhide is supposed to break from time to time. And does.

  i'm well aware of the danger.  and i've found that if i play with
beta releases and previews on an optional system, then there's the
overwhelming temptation that, when things go south, you just walk away
from it and wait for someone else to deal with it.

  OTOH, if you kind of depend on that system, then you have skin in
the game and are more prepared to invest time in debugging and
testing.

  that's not something i'd recommend to most folks.  but as long as i
guarantee that i can always recover in short order, it helps keep me
focused.  whatever works.

rday
--

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                               Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

        Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry.

Web page:                                          http://crashcourse.ca
Linked In:                             http://www.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================

-- 
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux