Re: does a fully updated beta correspond to an updated preview?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/6/2009 7:57 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Wed, 6 May 2009, Xia Shing Zee wrote:

>> It only takes 10 minutes to install preview. At least on an Intel
>> T8300 2.8GHz CPU with 3gb of ram. 5400rpm harddrive I think.

>   that would be true if we were talking about a redundant, throw-away
> system.  i'm actually running the f11 beta on my main laptop which, if
> things break, i'm under some pressure to get them fixed again or i
> don't get any work done.  so it's a bit more of an issue for me to
> re-install everything.

>   hence my recent carping and whining about radeon drivers not working
> and alpine being screwed up.  cuz when those things don't work, it
> really affects me.  and gives me serious incentive to try to debug
> them.

>   just living life dangerously.


You did read the warning about using Rawhide on production/needed machines
did you not?  :-)

Seriously. Rawhide is supposed to break from time to time. And does.


-- 


  David

-- 
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux