Hi, guys. I just got a bit inspired by a QA meeting discussion, and have made substantial revisions to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow . It should now be a lot more comprehensive and informative about the whole Fedora cycle (and it's also in the right order!) I know we considered it substantially a duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html , but I had second thoughts about that. That page doesn't cover the process exactly, more just describes the fields. It also really is mostly about RHEL, and I think trying to talk about the rather different RHEL and Fedora processes in one page would get very confusing. So I'm now thinking that https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow should be the official reference point for Fedora, and we can ask for the https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html page to say at the top that it talks about RHEL, and direct you to the Wiki page for the Fedora system. Does this sound sensible? Do my changes to the Wiki page look good to everyone? Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
