On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 06:22:27PM +0000, Lalit Dhiri wrote: > > From: awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx > > To: fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:02:04 -0800 > > Subject: RE: BugZappers > > > > > > > But, if you're still worried, by all means feel free not to sign it. If > > that's the case, I will take the matter up with the legal folks to see > > if we can remove the requirement for Bugzappers to sign the CLA. > > -- > > I think it's best to get a response from legal as I will not be signing the CLA. > > Sorry No need to be sorry. Spot and I have looked at this and determined there is no need for CLA completion for people who want to work in Bugzilla. It's nonsensical given that anyone can make a Bugzilla account independently to put content in that system. We still require any BugZappers who want to post content to the wiki to complete the CLA -- because if, hypothetically, we wanted to change the whole wiki at some future point to the Frickin' Foobar Freedom License, we don't want to have to track down every individual contributor in order to do so. The CLA gives us that flexibility while maintaining the freedom of all users' contributions. But again, the point is that we've lifted the cla_done membership requirement for the "fedorabugs" group, so BugZappers can fully participate in making better software without any unnecessary hassle. Bon appetit! -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
pgpw34VFkXveA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
