On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 18:22 +0000, Lalit Dhiri wrote: > ---------------------------------------- > > From: awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx > > To: fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:02:04 -0800 > > Subject: RE: BugZappers > > > > > > > But, if you're still worried, by all means feel free not to sign it. If > > that's the case, I will take the matter up with the legal folks to see > > if we can remove the requirement for Bugzappers to sign the CLA. > > -- > > I think it's best to get a response from legal as I will not be signing the CLA. OK, this has been fixed now. I talked to spot (part of the legal group) and he checked back and figured that fedorabugs requiring CLA signature is more or less a mistake. The requirement has now been removed. >From now on, other admins please note :), people don't need to sign the CLA to join Bugzappers. I'll approve Lalit's membership now. Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
