RE: BugZappers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 18:22 +0000, Lalit Dhiri wrote:
> ----------------------------------------
> > From: awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx
> > To: fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:02:04 -0800
> > Subject: RE: BugZappers
> >
> 
> >
> > But, if you're still worried, by all means feel free not to sign it. If
> > that's the case, I will take the matter up with the legal folks to see
> > if we can remove the requirement for Bugzappers to sign the CLA.
> > --
> 
> I think it's best to get a response from legal as I will not be signing the CLA.

OK, this has been fixed now. I talked to spot (part of the legal group)
and he checked back and figured that fedorabugs requiring CLA signature
is more or less a mistake. The requirement has now been removed.

>From now on, other admins please note :), people don't need to sign the
CLA to join Bugzappers. I'll approve Lalit's membership now.

Thanks!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux