2009/2/12 Robert Moskowitz <rgm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > Adam Williamson wrote: >> >> On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 14:15 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> >> >>> >>> + echo 'Patch #9 (tight-xorg-version.patch):' >>> Patch #9 (tight-xorg-version.patch): >>> + /bin/cat /home/me/rpmbuild/SOURCES/tight-xorg-version.patch >>> + /usr/bin/patc -s -p1 -b --suffix .version fuzz=0 >>> 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file >>> unix/xserver/configure.ac.rej >>> Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] >>> >>> And it does not matter if I reply with n or y, the rpmbuild fails. >>> >> >> Look at the patch. If the change it's supposed to do is truly already >> actually in the file, just disable the patch. >> > > Got it, Patch 9 is for X.org 1.6 support, which is only in FC11, so of > course for FC10, I have to back that out... Ok I built it for F9/xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.5.2-3.fc9. patch9 can be modfied slightly dont fully back it out see my modified version tightvnc-my-xorg-version.patch. their is one more gotcha, see patch tightvnc-complie15.patch I've done no testing just built it. ...dex
Attachment:
tightvnc-compile15.patch
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
tightvnc-my-xorg-version.patch
Description: Binary data
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
