dexter wrote:
2009/2/12 Robert Moskowitz <rgm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 14:15 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
+ echo 'Patch #9 (tight-xorg-version.patch):'
Patch #9 (tight-xorg-version.patch):
+ /bin/cat /home/me/rpmbuild/SOURCES/tight-xorg-version.patch
+ /usr/bin/patc -s -p1 -b --suffix .version fuzz=0
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
unix/xserver/configure.ac.rej
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
And it does not matter if I reply with n or y, the rpmbuild fails.
Look at the patch. If the change it's supposed to do is truly already
actually in the file, just disable the patch.
Got it, Patch 9 is for X.org 1.6 support, which is only in FC11, so of
course for FC10, I have to back that out...
Ok I built it for F9/xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.5.2-3.fc9. patch9 can be
modfied slightly dont fully back it out see my modified version
tightvnc-my-xorg-version.patch. their is one more gotcha, see patch
tightvnc-complie15.patch I've done no testing just built it.
thanks Dex, but...
This second patch you include, I should make that patch #10?
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
