Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 14:15 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
+ echo 'Patch #9 (tight-xorg-version.patch):'
Patch #9 (tight-xorg-version.patch):
+ /bin/cat /home/me/rpmbuild/SOURCES/tight-xorg-version.patch
+ /usr/bin/patc -s -p1 -b --suffix .version fuzz=0
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
unix/xserver/configure.ac.rej
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
And it does not matter if I reply with n or y, the rpmbuild fails.
Look at the patch. If the change it's supposed to do is truly already
actually in the file, just disable the patch.
Got it, Patch 9 is for X.org 1.6 support, which is only in FC11, so of
course for FC10, I have to back that out...
Well, I guess I am about at the end of my skill-set.
After the build running for some time (I am running this on a system
rated at only 800 bogomips), it dies with a message about:
xf86vncModule.cc:63: error: 'XORG_VERSION_CURRENT' was not declared in
this scope
Now this is declared in the patch I commented out for Xorg 1.6, but
don't see what is needed...
Where can I get some help/interest in TightVNC for FC10?
I did send an email to the person named in the changelog.
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
