On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 11:31 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > Will Woods wrote: > > At the usual time and place - #fedora-meeting on freenode, 1500UTC (that's 10AM US Eastern). > > > So have we moved the meeting time from16:00 back to 15:00? > > Agenda: > > > > - Fedora 11 Alpha > > - status > > - review of test procedures / results > > - Wiki use > > - Guidelines for naming test plans / test cases > > > > - QA team guidelines > > - Who gets to vote on decisions? Sponsors? > > - How do you get to be a QA team sponsor? > > - How do you get to be a QA team member? > > - What does being in the QA team require/provide? > > > Let's first come up with a QA team made from the community for the community > before coming up with any guidelines for QA > > I want everyone to take a look at http://sqa.net/ > and consider the Fedora QA procedure will be moved in that direction. > > The idea is that there will be made QA board consisting of one > representing from each SIG > > That representative task will be over sighting the QA of his SIG and > this board over sighting the QA of the whole Fedoraproject. There are good general quality practices and procedures listed at the URL provide above. But they also assume a level of resources we don't yet have. Over time as we gather more contributors, this could be something to look into. I do like the idea of outlining a structure so that specialty QA groups with similar interests can coalesce and provide service to other Fedora teams. Leam Hall has begun pulling some of this together to flesh out a new "Join Fedora" QA landing page. Thanks, James
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
