On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 13:06 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 13:03 -0400, Ty wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 11:23 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > > > > > Have you actually tested Xfce on XO to see if it performs better? > > > > > > > > it performs a ton better, i followed these directions: > > > > http://bc.tech.coop/blog/080130.html > > > > > > ... and congratulations, you've tested something which is entirely > > > different. > > > > i realized that, i just didnt know if it was the hardware that was the > > bottleneck or not. > > Yeah, but the problem is you're comparing apples and oranges to > determine the bottleneck. If you want to know if XFCE performs better, > then you need to test it in the same environment. definitely, what i originally said was incorrect. > > Which either means a) using an XFCE live image built the same way as the > GNOME ones and doing your comparison there or b) installing GNOME onto > the nand from a yum repo and comparing _that_ to XFCE installed that > way. > > Jeremy > -- γνῶθι σεαυτόν (know thyself) μηδὲν ἄγαν (nothing in excess) Ε -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
