On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 12:00 -0400, Ty wrote: > On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 21:24 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Steven Salevan wrote: > > > GNOME may indeed be more familiar to users, but what use is familiarity > > > if there's no functionality? At least XFCE can run comfortably on the > > > limited resources of the XO, allowing us to focus on the issues that we > > > can indeed address in the limited time we have. What do you guys think? > > > > Have you actually tested Xfce on XO to see if it performs better? > > it performs a ton better, i followed these directions: > http://bc.tech.coop/blog/080130.html ... and congratulations, you've tested something which is entirely different. The big problem *ISN'T* GNOME vs XFCE. The problem is the (large) hit we take on performance with squashfs decompression. So with the snap1 images, things have been changed a bit so that we can instead use the ext3fs and take decompression out of it. Which makes an impressive amount of difference Jeremy -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
