Jesse Keating wrote: > On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 23:55:08 -0500 > Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> This looks like a train wreck in progress to me. > > Like the Linux networking system isn't? Seriously. Apps assume that > what info they get at start is set in stone. Works real great across > going from coffee shop to friend's house to home. Without something > taking care of stuff, apps would fail to work. Progress. > > To be fair, if you don't have named installed, NM won't try to use it, > and will just munge resolve.conf and hope for the best. A local > caching nameserver with changing forwarders is about the best I think > we can do right now to keep braindead apps continuing to work across > address/resolver changes. > I _like_ a local caching nameserver. Too bad NM's implementation is broken. -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
