Neal Becker <ndbecker2@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Yeah, seems NM is writing resolv.conf, but I believe NM is also starting > named (as you see, chkconfig reports that named is not set to start) Wow, can it really be that broken? The excuse I've heard so far for NM's extensive brain damage is that it's only designed to support typical laptop usage, but how would that scenario include forcibly starting a doubtless-misconfigured local named? regards, tom lane -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
