On Monday 04 June 2007 11:44:40 Alan Cox wrote: > On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:36:23AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > > Honestly you should be thrilled if any Xen stuff work. Xen is still not > > upstream and they are stuck on an older kernel at the Xen upstream. What > > we > > What makes anyone think Xen ever will get upstream before KVM kills it off > and lguest replaces it for paravirt ? I don't. But I'm not really close to the kernel workings to know how much of a chance it has, or close enough to Xensource to know if they even want it to be upstream. > > have in fedora is a best effort forward port done as fast as it can, but > > the fact that it works at all in any configuration is pretty impressive > > to me. > > Indeed but like utrace you have to ask why its in a distribution that is > supposed to be tracking upstream ? I ask myself that a lot... -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpoI6TqLrPvI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
