On Monday 04 June 2007 11:36:23 Jesse Keating wrote: > On Monday 04 June 2007 11:23:55 Leslie Satenstein wrote: > > Bugzilla is a reasonably fine tool, but it needs an administrator to scan > > open bugs and either write them off, or put them into the "fix it up" > > queue. November to June and still no 32 bit XEN version... Should I not > > be frustrated? > > Honestly you should be thrilled if any Xen stuff work. Xen is still not > upstream and they are stuck on an older kernel at the Xen upstream. What > we have in fedora is a best effort forward port done as fast as it can, but > the fact that it works at all in any configuration is pretty impressive to > me. Hrm, this sounds wrong. The work our Xen team has done to make Xen functional for Fedora is flat out amazing. The situation they face with a Xen upstream not moving off an older kernel, Fedora steamrolling forward with as new of kernels as they come, and no Xen in the upstream kernel is a very very tough place to be in. I don't mean to detract from the hard work they've done. What I'm trying to point out is that the situation is pretty bad for having a rock solid Xen in Fedora 7, and what our team has done is great, but I wouldn't expect it to be perfect. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgp1fVJiRmZjs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
