On Friday 14 July 2006 08:57, tomhorsley@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Has pup screwed up at some point and installed i386 rpms when it should > have picked x86_64 ones? Have the repos gotten corrupted at some point? > Or is it really legitimate to have two conflicting rpms like this? Yum, which pup users, will install both the i386 and the x86_64 version of a package if you request to install "package". This ensures that you have a proper environment for running 32 bit software if need be. If there is a conflict between the i386 and the x86_64 version of a package provided in the x86_64 repository, then there is a bug in said package. If the package is supplied multiarch it must not have any conflicts. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpKvg4ehjMjI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list