Last night I was updating my FC6t1 system that is an x86_64 box. I installed this from the DVD iso and have always gotten updates since then by running pup. I got conflicts last night that were complaining about some library being needed by gnopernicus, so I did an rpm -q gnopernicus and found I had two gnopernicus rpms installed, both the same version, one i386 and one x86_64. Usiing the --list option, I found both of them install many files with the exact same name (no /lib versus /lib64), so it is hard to see how both rpms could actually be correctly installed simultaneously. Has pup screwed up at some point and installed i386 rpms when it should have picked x86_64 ones? Have the repos gotten corrupted at some point? Or is it really legitimate to have two conflicting rpms like this? -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list