Rahul Sundaram wrote:
D Canfield wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
My goal is not to bash the project here. I'm just saying that I
for one am totally lost as to what direction the project is headed
in, and based on the amount of back and forth conversation on this
list, it seems a lot of people are in the same boat. Is there some
vast repository of design goal and policy documents that I'm
missing somewhere?
http://fedora.redhat.com/About. Of course end users have different
opinions on the project.
I re-read all of that before posting last night. My point is more
that there are really no guidelines to how the project moves in terms
of development. What does a "stable" release mean to users, for
example?
Fedora in general tries to stay close to upstream as much as possible.
"stable" here would mean robustness and not stagnant or frozen
packages. Fedora does not use the term "stable releases" formally to
avoid this confusion. http://fedora.redhat.com/About/schedule/. A GA
would generally mean that these packages are considered to be robust
and consumable for end users. If they are not robust or does not
satisfy the typical use cases yet, they would in general be disabled
by default. This was the case for example SELinux in Fedora Core 3 or
Network Manager in any of the Fedora releases so far.
I meant to say SELinux in Fedora Core 2.
--
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list