LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose fglrxinfo libGL: XF86DRIGetClientDriverName: 8.21.7 fglrx (screen 0) libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/fglrx_dri.so libGL error: dlopen /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/fglrx_dri.so failed (/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/fglrx_dri.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory) libGL error: unable to find driver: fglrx_dri.so libGL: XF86DRIGetClientDriverName: 8.21.7 fglrx (screen 0) libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/fglrx_dri.so libGL error: dlopen /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/fglrx_dri.so failed (/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/fglrx_dri.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory) libGL error: unable to find driver: fglrx_dri.so display: :0.0 screen: 0 OpenGL vendor string: Mesa project: www.mesa3d.org OpenGL renderer string: Mesa GLX Indirect OpenGL version string: 1.2 (1.5 Mesa 6.4.1) Seems its trying to find its .so's in old XFree86 locations, not new xorg 7 ones :-) On Sat, 2006-02-04 at 09:08 -0500, Jorge Torres wrote: > Hi, > > Set the enviroment variable LIBGL_DEBUG to verbose and run fgl_glxgears > or fglrxinfo again. > > $ LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose fglrxinfo > > Please post the output. > > > ---- > Jorge Torres > > > > > El dom, 05--2006 a las 00:36 +1100, Steven Haigh escribió: > > On 04/02/2006, at 10:36 PM, Markku Kolkka wrote: > > > > > Steven Haigh kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika lauantai, 4. > > > helmikuuta 2006 04:44): > > >> Now, if I run fgl_glxgears -info, I get: > > >> Using GLX_SGIX_pbuffer > > >> GL_RENDERER = Mesa GLX Indirect > > >> GL_VERSION = 1.2 (1.5 Mesa 6.4.1) > > >> GL_EXTENSIONS = *snipped the million lines :P* > > >> X Error of failed request: GLXUnsupportedPrivateRequest > > >> Major opcode of failed request: 143 (GLX) > > >> Minor opcode of failed request: 16 (X_GLXVendorPrivate) > > >> Serial number of failed request: 29 > > >> Current serial number in output stream: 31 > > >> > > >> This makes me feel that it's falling back to Mesa instead of > > >> GL being handled by the ATI driver. Does this sound correct? > > > > > > Yes. See the /var/log/Xorg.0.log file to see why hardware > > > acceleration is failing. > > > > This is the problem - I can't see anywhere that says it's failing. in > > fact, in part of Xorg.0.log, I see: > > (II) fglrx(0): Acceleration enabled > > (II) fglrx(0): X context handle = 0x1 > > (II) fglrx(0): [DRI] installation complete > > (II) fglrx(0): Direct rendering enabled > > (II) Loading extension FGLRXEXTENSION > > (II) Loading extension ATITVOUT > > (II) fglrx(0): Interrupt handler installed at IRQ 11. > > > > Yet when I launch fireglcontrolpanel, it still shows Mesa to be the > > OpenGL library. The output of fglrxinfo also backs this up. > > > > Outputs are at: > > http://www.crc.id.au/fedora/Xorg.0.log > > http://www.crc.id.au/fedora/fglrxinfo > > > > In use config at: > > http://www.crc.id.au/fedora/xorg.conf > > > > The module 'fglrx' is loaded into the kernel, and all is sweet > > there... I'm outta ideas on this one :( > > > > -- > > Steven Haigh > > > > Email: netwiz@xxxxxxxxx > > Web: http://www.crc.id.au > > Phone: (03) 9017 0597 - 0412 935 897 > > > > > > > > > > >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list