On 04/02/2006, at 10:36 PM, Markku Kolkka wrote:
Steven Haigh kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika lauantai, 4.
helmikuuta 2006 04:44):
Now, if I run fgl_glxgears -info, I get:
Using GLX_SGIX_pbuffer
GL_RENDERER = Mesa GLX Indirect
GL_VERSION = 1.2 (1.5 Mesa 6.4.1)
GL_EXTENSIONS = *snipped the million lines :P*
X Error of failed request: GLXUnsupportedPrivateRequest
Major opcode of failed request: 143 (GLX)
Minor opcode of failed request: 16 (X_GLXVendorPrivate)
Serial number of failed request: 29
Current serial number in output stream: 31
This makes me feel that it's falling back to Mesa instead of
GL being handled by the ATI driver. Does this sound correct?
Yes. See the /var/log/Xorg.0.log file to see why hardware
acceleration is failing.
This is the problem - I can't see anywhere that says it's failing. in
fact, in part of Xorg.0.log, I see:
(II) fglrx(0): Acceleration enabled
(II) fglrx(0): X context handle = 0x1
(II) fglrx(0): [DRI] installation complete
(II) fglrx(0): Direct rendering enabled
(II) Loading extension FGLRXEXTENSION
(II) Loading extension ATITVOUT
(II) fglrx(0): Interrupt handler installed at IRQ 11.
Yet when I launch fireglcontrolpanel, it still shows Mesa to be the
OpenGL library. The output of fglrxinfo also backs this up.
Outputs are at:
http://www.crc.id.au/fedora/Xorg.0.log
http://www.crc.id.au/fedora/fglrxinfo
In use config at:
http://www.crc.id.au/fedora/xorg.conf
The module 'fglrx' is loaded into the kernel, and all is sweet
there... I'm outta ideas on this one :(
--
Steven Haigh
Email: netwiz@xxxxxxxxx
Web: http://www.crc.id.au
Phone: (03) 9017 0597 - 0412 935 897
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list