Hi
I think transparency is a large part of issue, as an old "chmod 740"
unix head, I'm quite happy with progress with owner/permissions tools
like get/setfacl, pam/ldap and winbind, but so much of SELINUX seems
to happen invisibly to users and to the kernel itself, it would be
nice if there was a separate ESELINUX that could be reported.
DAC based (Chmod etc) security doesnt provide us the additional layer
that SELinux does. They are complimentary. I dont understand the
reference to "ESELINUX".
--
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list