Rahul Sundaram wrote:
You are shooting the messenger there. You knew what security is.
I didn't mean it to be taken *too* negatively, of course I expect some
pain, as I mentioned we have servers with FC3 so our learning started
then ...
Eventually it will be transparent enough and provide additional
security by default which is what we are shooting for.
I think transparency is a large part of issue, as an old "chmod 740"
unix head, I'm quite happy with progress with owner/permissions tools
like get/setfacl, pam/ldap and winbind, but so much of SELINUX seems to
happen invisibly to users and to the kernel itself, it would be nice if
there was a separate ESELINUX that could be reported.
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list