Re: FC5T2 ready for even a test release?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi


Going through the list and selecting everything would be a pita, the users that want the "everything" have already stated why they want it back. I'm on the side of the fence of "I don't care, I've never installed everything in 7 years and I never will". However, I can see from this string of e-mails "why" it is important to some and I really wouldn't want to go through each category and sub category to select each item either, seems it would be very time consuming and all around a pita.

Yes it can be a pain but why is it required at all?

Minimum I think is more valid than everything, for reasons like were folks are limited to dial up or something slow and pulling down 5 iso's over a week or however long that would take would just be horrible. 1.) download 6mb boot.iso
2.) http install with minimum
3.) yum install what you need as you go


I don't have a d/l problem my self, I just like to install minium and put what I want on there sometimes.

Valid point here because you presented the use case of a dialup user and that makes the difference.


--
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]