On 1/15/06, dragoran <dragoran@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Same except I haven't looked at gnash, I saw it in a message to here but didn't look at the e-mail.
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Justin Conover wrote:
>
>> I'm curious how many of the 64 bit os users out there, really need a
>> 64bit web browser?
>>
>> Is there any reason you couldn't live with a 32 bit one?
>>
>> Can Fedora put firefox.i386 in the x86_64 tree, just like several
>> other i386 rpms?
>>
>> I realize adding it is pretty simple, I've done it for a long time.
>> However with processors being realitivly cheap new users are buying
>> the amd64 all the time and want to run a 64 bit os. We either turn
>> around and tell them, go to mozilla.org <http://mozilla.org/ > grab
>> the package and install it else were ( can't find fedora bugs ) or cp
>> your fedora.repo add i386 through it, and overlap a hole lot of
>> packages, "have fun with that"....
>>
>> I personally use one from mozilla.org <http://mozilla.org/> at the
>> moment because I do need things like flash and plugins like that.
>> Before you start whining telling me its closed source, my wife is a
>> photorgrapher and her website has a lot of flash, I'm sure many of
>> you can understand telling your wife no, can't go to your website
>> because you used closed source flash would go over like a lead ballon
>> ;) And its not just here site, I go to a lot of places that have
>> flash and so do a lot of people.
>
>
> Does open source solutions like Swfdec, Gnash and GPLFlash work for
> you?. If anyone packages these up, it might be worth checking out.
>
gnash does not build on x86_64
swfdec has no plugin
gplflash keeps crashing firefox
--
Same except I haven't looked at gnash, I saw it in a message to here but didn't look at the e-mail.
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list