Tomas Mraz wrote:
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 18:05 -0500, Jim Cornette wrote:
Tomas Mraz wrote:
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 16:07 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Tomas Mraz wrote:
Isn't it this one?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176771
The report is same but disabling SELinux with setenforce 0 doesnt change
the behavior of gedit on my system.
Have you done 'su -' again after setenforce 0?
I tried setenforce 0 followed by trying to launch gedit as Rahul
reported with the same failure. Running su - (in a different shell)
after setenforce 0 allows gedit to start, though it loads very slowly.
Then it is the #176771. The slow loading is probably a completely
different problem.
I just tried opening gedit in a shell that was su - with SELinux
enabled. Gedit seems to load at historical speed and does not exhibit
errors any longer.
One less bug, I guess.
Jim
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list