Justin Conover wrote:
On 5/30/05, Keith Sharp <kms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 10:38 -0700, Scott wrote:
Kyrre Ness Sjobak wrote:
lør, 28.05.2005 kl. 03.29 skrev seth vidal:
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 18:04 -0700, Teak Billard wrote:
Would Fedora Extras be the place to have Mono
available then or another repository such as Dag?
fedora extras is under the same legal restrictions as fedora core.
-sv
Hmm.. What about some "semi-official" repo like livna, but with
mono-stuff (Mpackage?)
Kyrre
I notice that the mono site has a yum repo for FC3, Is anything else required?
You would need to get the SRPMs and rebuild them for FC4T3 (and FC4
eventually). It would also make sense to go over the SPEC files and
make sure they were meeting the requirements of the Extras project.
Finally you should check there is nothing the SPECs/RPMs that would
preclude them moving to Core should the legal/patents issues ever be
cleared up.
Keith.
I have used/rebuilt on rawhide nrpms.net in the past, the only problem
I had was building on x86_64, has a yum.repo for just mono too,
Matthew Hall has i386/ppc for fc 2/3. You could look at his spec
files and start from there, or contact him for help/suggestions, small
chance he would want to start something like Mpackage or maybe help
maintain the packages. (not sure)
http://www.nrpms.net/
http://www.nrpms.net/Docs/Yum/
"If you just want access to mono packages, you need to perform the
following command (as the root user):
rpm -ivh http://repo.nrpms.net/nrpms-mono-release/1/RPMS/nrpms-mono-release-1-1.1.fc3.nr.noarch.rpm
"
For what its worth, Livna already has spec-files for Mono and Gtk-Sharp:
Mono - http://bugzilla.livna.org/show_bug.cgi?id=330
Gtk-Sharp - http://bugzilla.livna.org/show_bug.cgi?id=408
Although the gtk-sharp.spec file seems to be unaccesible at the moment.
/Jacob