On 5/30/05, Keith Sharp <kms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 10:38 -0700, Scott wrote: > > Kyrre Ness Sjobak wrote: > > > > >lør, 28.05.2005 kl. 03.29 skrev seth vidal: > > > > > > > > >>On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 18:04 -0700, Teak Billard wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >>>Would Fedora Extras be the place to have Mono > > >>>available then or another repository such as Dag? > > >>> > > >>> > > >>fedora extras is under the same legal restrictions as fedora core. > > >> > > >>-sv > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >Hmm.. What about some "semi-official" repo like livna, but with > > >mono-stuff (Mpackage?) > > > > > >Kyrre > > > > I notice that the mono site has a yum repo for FC3, Is anything else required? > > You would need to get the SRPMs and rebuild them for FC4T3 (and FC4 > eventually). It would also make sense to go over the SPEC files and > make sure they were meeting the requirements of the Extras project. > Finally you should check there is nothing the SPECs/RPMs that would > preclude them moving to Core should the legal/patents issues ever be > cleared up. > > Keith. > I have used/rebuilt on rawhide nrpms.net in the past, the only problem I had was building on x86_64, has a yum.repo for just mono too, Matthew Hall has i386/ppc for fc 2/3. You could look at his spec files and start from there, or contact him for help/suggestions, small chance he would want to start something like Mpackage or maybe help maintain the packages. (not sure) http://www.nrpms.net/ http://www.nrpms.net/Docs/Yum/ "If you just want access to mono packages, you need to perform the following command (as the root user): rpm -ivh http://repo.nrpms.net/nrpms-mono-release/1/RPMS/nrpms-mono-release-1-1.1.fc3.nr.noarch.rpm "