On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 10:38 -0700, Scott wrote: > Kyrre Ness Sjobak wrote: > > >l�8.05.2005 kl. 03.29 skrev seth vidal: > > > > > >>On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 18:04 -0700, Teak Billard wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Would Fedora Extras be the place to have Mono > >>>available then or another repository such as Dag? > >>> > >>> > >>fedora extras is under the same legal restrictions as fedora core. > >> > >>-sv > >> > >> > >> > > > >Hmm.. What about some "semi-official" repo like livna, but with > >mono-stuff (Mpackage?) > > > >Kyrre > > I notice that the mono site has a yum repo for FC3, Is anything else required? You would need to get the SRPMs and rebuild them for FC4T3 (and FC4 eventually). It would also make sense to go over the SPEC files and make sure they were meeting the requirements of the Extras project. Finally you should check there is nothing the SPECs/RPMs that would preclude them moving to Core should the legal/patents issues ever be cleared up. Keith.