Re: Switching to Rawhide, trying pup, surprised no conflicts upgrading

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 08:44 -0400, Jim Cornette wrote:
> Notes on pup, I like it so far. The information during package install 
> was vague and the only indication of where one was in the installation 
> process was when the process was completed. When upgrading 300 packages, 
>   a display regarding where you are in the upgrading would be 
> information worth knowing. I am sure this information will be added later.

I installed pup from Rawhide on FC4, and while I like the concept, the
interface and the execution do need a bit more polish. But it's only at
0.0.1, so there's plenty of time for improvement on both parts.

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://fedora.ivazquez.net/

gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]