On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Pedro Fernandes Macedo wrote: > Stephen Smalley wrote: > >On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 12:19 +0200, Bjorn Andersen wrote: > >>tir, 14 06 2005 kl. 10:30 +0300, skrev Î?Ï?Ï?καÏ? Î?ημήÏ?Ï?ιοÏ?: > >>>Although had been pointed out before this bug still exists in final > >>>version!!! > >>>1) Installing FC4 64 with reiserfs system the system fails to boot since > >>>it' can't mount the root fs!!! > >>I it not a SELinux problem here? Reaiser FS is not kompatible with > >>SELinux. > >That should have been addressed (i.e. reiserfs xattr support has > >allegedly been fixed upstream to work properly with SELinux), but others > >have also reported breakage with reiserfs in FC4. Whether or not it is > >SELinux-related, I'm not sure. > Well , XFS is compatible with selinux and same problem occurs if /boot > is a XFS filesystem (grub segfaults during setup). If you use ext3 for > /boot , you can use XFS (and probably reiser) for the other partitions , > as long as you dont use mount-by-label. Manually removing all label > references on my fstab and grub.conf made it work perfectly (/boot ext3 > , / and /home xfs. /home was the only partition that was from a previous > install and wasnt formatted). These are all well known issues with fedora: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=159123 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=159188 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=156460 -Dan