Re: FC4t2 no good without LILO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On 4/12/05, Mike Bird <mgb-fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
  
Historically Grub has been unreliable.  [See bugzillas for Fedora,
Debian, GNU, etc, etc.]  If someone tested the latest version of Grub
for six months and found no bugs at all, that would not change the fact
that historically Grub has been notoriously unreliable.
    

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?product=Red+Hat+Linux&component=lilo&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=CLOSED&bug_status=NEEDINFO&bug_status=MODIFIED&bug_status=ASSIGN_TO_PM&bug_status=INVESTIGATE&bug_status=SPEC&bug_status=ON_DEV&bug_status=QA_READY&bug_status=ON_QA&bug_status=PROD_READY&bug_status=FAILS_QA& amp;short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=

yawn... historically...lilo was removed once before.. in a test
release i think during fc1 testing phase... it came back because there
were SPECIFIC issues that were flagged during testing that convinced
developers to keep lilo in.

http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2003-October/msg00945.html

or go though the never ending lilo-grub threads.

--
shrek-m

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]