On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 14:27 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 12:59 +0100, Mary Ellen Foster wrote:
> >
> > Out of curiosity, what happened to the version number here? I mean,
> > why's there a "6:" in the version number at all, and then why are
> > there so many of them in the changelog line?
>
> the 6: means that the package has an epoch of 6. Why it has twice the
> 666 epoch is bewildering... must be something double evil.
Presumably somebody accidentally hit the "repeat 6 times" key sequence
in vim... pretty common typo, strangely enough.
--
Peter