søn, 03.04.2005 kl. 07.28 skrev dragoran: > Paul wrote: > > >Hi, > > > > > > > >>this is a question I receive froom some Fedora Core 3 users. After > >>they have tried Ubuntu, they complained about the 'slow speed' of > >>Fedora. Their major complain are the number of seriveces enabled by > >>default event though they choose to do desktop installation. Another > >>complain I heard are the memory on which they use Ubuntu (once again) > >>to be efficient. How should I respend on that kind of question? > >> > >> > > > >It is possible by using parallel loading (there is a thing on the IBM > >website, but it's not for the easily scared!). > > > >The thing you've got to remember with Ubuntu is that it really is a > >minimal running Linux - if you stripped down the number of services FC > >starts on power up to the same as Ubuntu, you'd find the boot up is > >faster (not having to boot from CD). > > > >Currently, I've not got that many services running on either my laptop > >or this PC and it's on the desktop ready for me to use in just shy of 90 > >seconds - which is much faster than Ubuntu! > > > >TTFN > > > >Paul > > > > > Parallel loading doen't help much. This have already been discussed in > the devel-list. Yes there was a lot of talk about getting down boot time - but what did come of it? It isn't listed as major goals for fc4 anymore - so will fc4 boot faster than fc3 did, or did this effort run out in the sand? Kyrre