Hi, > this is a question I receive froom some Fedora Core 3 users. After > they have tried Ubuntu, they complained about the 'slow speed' of > Fedora. Their major complain are the number of seriveces enabled by > default event though they choose to do desktop installation. Another > complain I heard are the memory on which they use Ubuntu (once again) > to be efficient. How should I respend on that kind of question? It is possible by using parallel loading (there is a thing on the IBM website, but it's not for the easily scared!). The thing you've got to remember with Ubuntu is that it really is a minimal running Linux - if you stripped down the number of services FC starts on power up to the same as Ubuntu, you'd find the boot up is faster (not having to boot from CD). Currently, I've not got that many services running on either my laptop or this PC and it's on the desktop ready for me to use in just shy of 90 seconds - which is much faster than Ubuntu! TTFN Paul -- "It is often said that something cannot be libel if it is the truth. This has had to be amended to 'something cannot be libel if it is the truth or if the bank balance says otherwise'" - US Today
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part