On Wednesday 23 March 2005 23:09, Roger Grosswiler wrote: > > On 03/23/2005 10:52:40 PM, Raymond Lillard wrote: > >> Dawid Zamirski wrote: > >>> seth vidal wrote: > >>>>> System-config-packages really needs, I would say, requires, > >>>>> an option allowing to see everything instead of just a subset of > >>>>> the > >>>>> distribution like presently. Yes, I filed an RFE a loooong > >>>>> time ago. But FC4 will be still another release of Fedora > >>>>> where most of the distribution is not visible from > >>>>> system-config-packages so the only solution is use RPM from > >>>>> the command line, while fighting dependencies and trying to > >>>>> find what CD has the required package. > >> > >> On a related topic, I agree it would be good to have complete > >> control over the package selection, what I would like even > >> better would be the return of the list of additional packages > >> needed to satisfy the dependencies of the chosen packages. > >> > >> Often times, one selects a single small package with out > >> knowing its dependencies and suddenly pulls in a ton of > >> stuff that was not wanted. > > > > yum does this, I would expect pup would too. > > > > -- > > hopefully, gyum will be quickly in the extras, in my opinion it is a real > good "replacement" for system-config-packages, as yum even resolves the > dependencies. Unfortunately, i did not test it that much, i use almost yum > in the shell ;-) > > Isn't pup for printers?? Nope, that's cups Tom -- Tom Taylor registered linux #263467