> > On 03/23/2005 10:52:40 PM, Raymond Lillard wrote: >> Dawid Zamirski wrote: >>> seth vidal wrote: >>> >>>>> System-config-packages really needs, I would say, requires, >>>>> an option allowing to see everything instead of just a subset of >>>>> the >>>>> distribution like presently. Yes, I filed an RFE a loooong >>>>> time ago. But FC4 will be still another release of Fedora >>>>> where most of the distribution is not visible from >>>>> system-config-packages so the only solution is use RPM from >>>>> the command line, while fighting dependencies and trying to >>>>> find what CD has the required package. >> >> On a related topic, I agree it would be good to have complete >> control over the package selection, what I would like even >> better would be the return of the list of additional packages >> needed to satisfy the dependencies of the chosen packages. >> >> Often times, one selects a single small package with out >> knowing its dependencies and suddenly pulls in a ton of >> stuff that was not wanted. > > yum does this, I would expect pup would too. > > -- hopefully, gyum will be quickly in the extras, in my opinion it is a real good "replacement" for system-config-packages, as yum even resolves the dependencies. Unfortunately, i did not test it that much, i use almost yum in the shell ;-) Isn't pup for printers?? Roger