> The pup work that Seth refers to is a front end to yum, and it's called > "pup". > not entirely. Being a front end to yum, just like being a front end to apt, would make for an EXTREMELY complex interface. Gui programs that are merely front ends to cli programs are typically not-so-good. If you need any evidence of that look at all the programs that try to wrap mkisos and cdrecord. They're a nightmare. But then you look at something like the nautilus cd burning interface and it's reasonably straightforward. -sv