On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 11:36:37PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 17:12 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote: > > The latest official upstream release has a major of 0. Probably > > fedora.us has a development version. > In apt's case there are good reasons for using the svn-head version, > biggest reason perhaps being proper SELinux support. Sure, you could > take just that patch and apply to cnc6 .. but I just happen to know svn- > head is stable and has bunch of other nice stuff besides just selinux- > support. :) > > Too bad Gustavo hasn't gotten around to releasing cnc7 :( I've been > thinking of making an unofficial release out of the current tree but > probably that would just confuse matters even more. :-/ The fact that the svn server is down doesn't make it easier :( I launched a request for a final release at apt-rpm. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpPryisZBX09.pgp
Description: PGP signature