On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 02:14:39PM +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 23:32 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > > > Is all the above just unfinished yet a version transition or some > > kind of an elaborate joke? If this is a joke then I do not get it. > > Moving Applications -> Desktop Preferences to Desktop -> Preferences is > intentional and the result of much upstream discussion. This is not a big issue per se. What I strongly dislike though is that "custom menu" is getting longer and longer. Think about somebody with a poorer sight who really needs much bigger letters, and add on the top of it a translation to some language where descriptions tend to be more verbose, although "Applications" is not a four letter word either, and you ate much of a panel. Multiple panels are not a universal option. I would like to have at least a possibility to replace these "headers" with some, even abstract, icons. Tools to customize menus, at last, would be nice too. > However, any missing menu items or menu items that you feel shouldn't > be in the menu are probably just teething issues which you should log > against redhat-menus. Before you do so, though, make sure you have the > very latest gnome-menus and that the gnome-menus package isn't > installing any .menu or .directory files. At this moment this seem to be a somewhat mess. Old redhat-menus and new gnome-menus, which was all what was available yesterday, collide a bit and that is why I was just asking what is going on. Quite possibly things will get more orderly in short time. OTOH this "MTA Switcher" on a menu left me scratching my head. How often do you perform such operation? Every second day, once a week, once a year or once in a blue moon after careful consideration of pros and cons? And the fact that it even works for a non-root and without any password got me floored. Somebody may even use it in a full innocence not realizing what s/he is doing. How this may happen? Michal