On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 17:58 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 02:14:39PM +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 23:32 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > > > > > Is all the above just unfinished yet a version transition or some > > > kind of an elaborate joke? If this is a joke then I do not get it. > > > > Moving Applications -> Desktop Preferences to Desktop -> Preferences is > > intentional and the result of much upstream discussion. > > This is not a big issue per se. What I strongly dislike though is > that "custom menu" is getting longer and longer. Think about > somebody with a poorer sight who really needs much bigger letters, > and add on the top of it a translation to some language where > descriptions tend to be more verbose, although "Applications" is not > a four letter word either, and you ate much of a panel. Multiple > panels are not a universal option. I would like to have at least a > possibility to replace these "headers" with some, even abstract, > icons. Tools to customize menus, at last, would be nice too. That's a discussion for upstream where it has already been agonized over. > OTOH this "MTA Switcher" on a menu left me scratching my head. How > often do you perform such operation? Every second day, once a week, > once a year or once in a blue moon after careful consideration of > pros and cons? And the fact that it even works for a non-root and > without any password got me floored. Somebody may even use it in a > full innocence not realizing what s/he is doing. How this may > happen? Dude, its rawhide, its buggy, it wasn't a design decision. Log bugs :-) (Or preferably see if you can figure out how to fix it in redhat-menus and submit a patch) Mark.