Re: Should Fedora rpms be signed? Yes...resign and rsync...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le samedi 30 octobre 2004 à 13:41 -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz a écrit :
> On Sat, 2004-10-30 at 21:31 +0200, Matias Féliciano wrote:
> > Small penalty transfer. But reading 1 Go^UGB of data is a big penalty.
> > 
> 
> Point taken. On the other hand, how often is the batch of unsigned
> packages that large? Does that happen often?
> 

When Red Hat prepare a new official release (FC3T2, FC3, ...) near all
packages are signed. After the release, new packages are not signed.
Unsigned packages grow until a new official release is out.

> Cheers,
> 
> -- 
> fedora-test-list mailing list
> fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: 
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]