On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 22:14 +0200, Matias Féliciano wrote: > signed package, mean signed package. > Go to the gnupg documentation if you want to learn more : > http://www.gnupg.org/documentation/index.html > Matías, Even though I believe you have some interesting points, pointing very experienced programmers such as Dave and Jeff to the GNUPG docs is downright insulting and (I would say) entirely inappropriate. *They* have a lot of credibility and have earned a reputation for expertise and objectivity in this community, as far as I can tell from my measly 10 years of participation in it. *You* do not have their level of credibility yet, and disrespect to someone who is giving your points serious thought and consideration is no way to get it. Be nice. -- Rodolfo J. Paiz <rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part