Re: Should Fedora rpms be signed?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le vendredi 29 octobre 2004 à 12:45 -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz a écrit :

>  Matías is vehemently pro signing
> *every* package

Yes. But I never said that a signed repository is a bad solution :-)

Signing repository has its benefit.
Signing every packages has its benefit.

But I don't think it's easer to sign a repository than all the packages.

For signing a repository, one command line would be used (I suppose) :
- gpg --sign ... OR createrepo --addsign

For signing all packages, one command line would be used :
- rpm --addsign <list of rpm package>

If Red Hat can use one of these methods, they can easily do both (It's
seems).

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]