On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 19:30, Matias Féliciano wrote: [snip] > > Two examples from the FC2 cycle come to mind that might have caused > > problems: evolution 1.5 and selinux. > > During Release Candidat ? Are you sure ? Were there even any 'release candidates' during FC2 testing? I quite honestly don't remember. Personally, I don't think it matters, though, as I don't recall any clear distinction being drawn between 'test' and 'release candidate'. I'm not saying there *shouldn't* be a distinction, I just don't remember it being explained (though, admittedly, I haven't read *every* post ;-)). The way I see it is that the development and testing phase of a release is asymptotic in nature. We're winding down significantly during the so-called 'release candidate' stage. But surprises can and do happen. And when they do, feature freeze or not, sometimes it makes sense to back something out of the release if it can be determined that the lateness vs. feature removal tradeoff warrants it. -- -Paul Iadonisi Senior System Administrator Red Hat Certified Engineer / Local Linux Lobbyist Ever see a penguin fly? -- Try Linux. GPL all the way: Sell services, don't lease secrets