Le vendredi 29 octobre 2004 à 15:19 -0600, Kim Lux a écrit : > I'm a bit choked about something: I posted issues to the list for a day > and repeatedly was told that the problem was because I UPGRADED from a > stable FC2 to FC3T3. I was assured that if I did a fresh install all my > problems would disappear. In fact, none of them did. Now today I've > heard from several people that they want to hear responses from people > who are specifically UPGRADING. I'll bet that 50% of the FC3 installs > are going to be UPGRADES, probably half of them from FC2. I do not > think it was smart for the board to write off my issues as being > "upgrade related" and "solved". They should have been given attention > when they existed as a upgraded installation. My "opinion". Today, Fedora does not support : - FC(x) => FC(x+1)T(y) and FC(x)T(y) => FC(x) . I think Fedora should support (this mean fedora should no reply with "do a fresh install please" for a bug) if 'y' (test) is equal to 3. Or more realistically : - FCx => FC(x+1)RC(y) and FC(x)RC(y) => FC(x) should be supported.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=