Le mardi 26 octobre 2004 à 10:54 -0400, William Hooper a écrit : > Matias Féliciano said: > > Le mardi 26 octobre 2004 à 13:17 +0200, nodata a écrit : > > > >> Fedora Core test (rawhide) isn't signed. > >> > >> > >> Why? > >> > >> > > > > Or : > > RHEL beta is signed. > > Why ? > > You are beating a dead horse. > > A) Fedora Rawhide isn't RHEL. > B) RHEL Betas move slowly (as an example, there have only been a perl > update and an RPM update since the RHEL v4 Beta was released in > September). As Test Fedora, Beta RHEL is not for mission critical. As Test Fedora, Beta RHEL is for test propose. As Test Fedora, Beta RHEL is not a supported product. As Test Fedora, Beta RHEL is public. As Test Fedora, Beta RHEL is only composed with free software. As Test Fedora, Beta RHEL is free ($0). > C) RHEL Betas use RHN. And rpms are signed. useless ? > D) Fedora Test releases (which are a better comparison to RHEL Beta > releases) are signed. And updates are not (contrary to RHEL Beta). So, the question is not closed : Why all Beta RHEL packages are signed ?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=