Re: Should Fedora rpms be signed?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matias Féliciano said:
> Le mardi 26 octobre 2004 à 13:17 +0200, nodata a écrit :
>
>> Fedora Core test (rawhide) isn't signed.
>>
>>
>> Why?
>>
>>
>
> Or :
> RHEL beta is signed.
> Why ?

You are beating a dead horse.

A) Fedora Rawhide isn't RHEL.
B) RHEL Betas move slowly (as an example, there have only been a perl
update and an RPM update since the RHEL v4 Beta was released in
September).
C) RHEL Betas use RHN.
D) Fedora Test releases (which are a better comparison to RHEL Beta
releases) are signed.

-- 
William Hooper


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]