Re: Should Fedora rpms be signed?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le mardi 26 octobre 2004 à 13:17 +0200, nodata a écrit :
> Fedora Core test (rawhide) isn't signed.
> 
> Why?
> 

Or :
RHEL beta is signed.
Why ?

I decide to not use mirrors for rawhide.
/etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-devel.repo
        [development]
        name=Fedora Core $releasever - Development Tree
        baseurl=http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/$basearch/
        enabled=1

Not as good as signed rpm.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]